ENGLISH 460 4:10-5:35, TTH, Franz 038 Fall
2009 U. of Portland Dr.
Herman Asarnow
Office: BC 235 TELEPHONES: Office 503-943-7244; Home: 503-244-5854
Office Hours: TTH--12:30-2:30; also by appointment.
Internet (e-mail) address: asarnow@up.edu Web page: http://faculty.up.edu/asarnow/(has link to our class website)
Contemporary American
Poetry
TEXTS:
Required:
A. Poulin, Jr. and
Michael Waters, ed. Contemporary American
Poetry, 8th edition (2006) Houghton Mifflin, ISBN: 9780618527854
A.E. Stallings, Hapax, TriQuarterly
Books, 2006, ISBN: 0810151715
Li-Young Lee, Behind My Eyes, Norton (2009), ISBN:
9780393334814
Chase Twichell, Snow Watcher, Norton (1998), ISBN: 9780865380936
Rita Dove, Thomas and Beulah, Carnegie Mellon Press
(1986), ISBN: 9780887480218
Louise Glück, The Seven Ages, Ecco Press (2002) ,
ISBN: 9780060933494
Andrew Hudgins, After the Lost War, Houghton Mifflin
(1986), ISBN: 9780395457139
Philip Levine, The Simple Truth, Knopf (1996), ISBN: 9780679765844
Mary Oliver, White Pine, Harcourt Brace (1994), ISBN:
9780156001205
C.K. Williams, The Singing, Farrar, Straus & Giroux
(2004), ISBN: 9780374529505
Not Required, but
available in the library or at Powell’s if you need to 'brush up' on the elements
of poetry:
Mary Oliver, A Poetry Handbook, Harcourt Brace
Plus
theoretical/critical readings on Electronic Reserve, available online from
UP’s library, including pieces by T.S. Eliot, Ron Baughman, Albert Gelpi, R.S.
Gwynn, Denise Levertov, Philip Levine, Jim Longenbach, Amy Lowell, Carole
Muske, Frank O’Hara, Alicia Ostriker, Ira Sadoff, and David Yezzi. (See
attached Reserve Reading List.) Some of these readings will be required, some
optional.
PURPOSE OF THE COURSE
Above all, my goal is
to have a diverse group of able students come to see the value of the poetry of
our moment: how it powerfully focuses us on key existential issues of our time,
and how it provides formal, literary pleasures. I have chosen books by a wide
range of poets—diverse in ethnicity, gender, race, age, religion, and, above all, poetical styles—so
that we will be able to read a broad spectrum of recent poetry, though the list
is, of course, not exhaustive. Thus the
class will survey contemporary American poetry, both lyric and narrative, and
examine our diverse voices, languages, and styles—as well as our common
post-modern concerns. We will see how skilled poets of our era are confronting
the big issues now at stake. To
establish a context for our reading of 9 recent books of poetry,. we will spend
our first 3 weeks reading poetry from our anthology by the immediate past
generation of American poets and also seminal critical essays. Then we’ll dive into our individual
collections of poems. Class members will thus have the opportunity to read,
discuss, write about, and present their ideas about a wide range of
contemporary poetry—and to read and hear the ideas of others.
LEARNING
OBJECTIVES In English 460, you should expect to:
DEVELOPMENT
You will work to develop these skills through:
WHAT WE WILL DO IN CLASS
Initially,
we will read selections of poems from our anthology, plus critical articles on
contemporary poetry, so class will at first consist of discussing the gist of
the articles, and then applying their ideas to the poets of the 1950s-1970s,
the immediate forebears to the generation of poets that we’ll be reading for
most of the term. (Be prepared for a lot of reading!) Then we will spend a week each on books by 9
poets, starting with a short presentation by class members about the poet and
the literary and cultural context of his or her work, and then continuing with
discussion of 1/2 of the book per class period.
Since most of these books are virtually brand new, we won’t rely on
“expert” opinions about them, but explore, question, and probe them—and our
reactions to them—within the context of our own experiences and of ideas about
contemporary American poetry we have read early in the course. What the poet
Chase Twichell (who will be visiting UP and our class this term!) wrote about
poetry—“Poetry isn’t window cleaning./It breaks the glass”— holds for how we
shall read these contemporary poets. We’ll read them according to conventional
wisdom, and also measure them against our own experience as people and readers. In class,
we will certainly laugh, gasp, get chills up our spines, and sometimes roll our
eyes, as we become a community of readers responding to poetry of our own era
by our own poets, people trying to write, as Ezra Pound said of poetry, “news
that stays news.”
WRITTEN & ORAL WORK;
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
1. Six
short, 2-3 page (12 font, double-spaced), response/analysis papers, one
each on 6 of the 9 books of poetry we’ll read.
I’ll pass out an instruction sheet for this assignment. Basically, each paper will try to
characterize the kind of poem (both form/style and subject) the poet writes, focusing
on 1-3 of the poems to illustrate its points. NOTE: Two of these papers may be
poems in imitation of/after the manner of the poetry of the poet being
read—preceded by a 2 page, prose, “scholarly” analysis of the poem that
follows, explaining in detail the ways in which it is like the poetry of the
poet being studied.
2. One 15-minute group oral ‘kick off report” to start our discussion of
one of the 9 books of poetry. Each
student will present a brief biography
of the poet, a brief tour of the poet’s thematic interests (as gleaned from
criticism and reviews of his or her work, as well as from reading the book in
question and scanning other books by the poet), a summary of the forms,
diction, imagery, and figurative language the poet characteristically uses—with
brief examples (again, taken mostly from what others have written about him or
her), and, finally, a short mention of the other poets the poet may be grouped
with, or spoken about with in the same breath, or the “school” or “movement”
the poet may be associated with. As part of their Kick-Off Report, compose and
distribute a helpful handout for the class.
3. One longer
(approximately 10-12 page) analysis/research paper. This paper will analyze 1 of our 9 poetry collections in depth, finding and tying
together patterns and motifs of language, imagery, structure, and/or
subjects—and exploring in some depth the poet’s themes in this book. I would expect to see fairly thorough
analysis of 2-4 of the poems in the book, plus reference to and brief examples
from a good number of the other poems. Reference to essays from our reserve reading
on contemporary poetry and poetics are necessary to add depth to your paper. The paper can also include the presentation
and analysis of poems from other books by the same poet, to give depth and
perspective to its reading of the book the paper is focusing on. The paper will naturally entail a research
component, especially as you consider in what context you are seeing the poet
(part of a “school of poetry,” or a social context, or an historical moment,
etc.) . You won’t find a great deal
written about most of these poets’ work, especially about these recent books,
except for reviews—though some of those will be helpful. You might also find
interviews with your poet. So you will
likely need to read about (and from) their other books (if any), and about
contemporary poetry in general.
4. One 15-20 minute presentation of your
analysis/research paper. I’ll hand out an instruction sheet for this
assignment. Surely you will consider
making handouts, overheads, etc., as needed to make your 15 minutes of
(scholarly) fame rich and rewarding for your fellow seminar members.
E-MAIL &
ATTENDANCE: You are required to check
your UP e-mail address daily. I often make important announcements this
way. Class attendance is mandatory. I
also expect you to be at the poetry reading by Chase Twichell (Friday, 11/5,
7:30 p.m.) and the lecture by John Felstiner (Tuesday, 10/6, 7:30 p.m.)—unless
you have another class that meets at that time. You must let me know. Absences for illness, participation in
official university extra-curricular activities and serious familial
obligations may be excused if you notify me in advance. Missing any part of class for a less
imperative university appointment (advising, etc.) is unexcused. Other missed classes will reduce your
attendance/participation grade significantly.
If you miss class, it is your responsibility to learn the nature
of any assignment you might miss.
Intellectual/Academic
Integrity: Note: For any assignment, all borrowed ideas as well as borrowed words must be cited using the MLA
format for the kind of source being cited.
This includes borrowings from the Web.
No exceptions.
PLAGIARISM AND ACADEMIC INTEGRITY: I expect that all of your assignments for
this course will contain original work by you written for this class. The course does not require you to use
outside sources, and I strongly suggest that you do not do so. However, if you do, it is your responsibility
to cite these sources properly. Plagiarism, defined as representing another
person’s language, ideas, or thoughts as your own, is a serious offense. When
you put someone’s ideas in your own words, or copy them directly (including
material from the web, a friend’s paper, anything you yourself have not
written), you must cite or quote them. Students who commit plagiarism will be
reported to the appropriate University authority. Believe me, you don’t want
this to happen! All borrowed ideas and words must be cited in your papers
(using the MLA—Modern Language Association—format available to you in The Pocket Wadsworth Handbook. No
exceptions. Here is the
Academic
integrity is openness and honesty in all scholarly endeavors. The University of
Portland is a scholarly community dedicated to the discovery, investigation,
and dissemination of truth, and to the development of the whole person. Membership in this community is a privilege,
requiring each person to practice academic integrity at its highest level,
while expecting and promoting the same in others. Breaches of academic integrity will not be
tolerated and will be addressed by the community with all due gravity.
Turnitin.com: A requirement for all three papers for this
class:
For you to receive credit for your work,
all six short papers and the one long paper written for this course must be
submitted by the due date to Turnitin.com, using the following
instructions. This site checks papers
for signs of plagiarism. (See UP’s statement
on plagiarism, above, as well as pages 177-181 of The Pocket Wadsworth Handbook, which has useful instruction on how
to avoid plagiarism.) If you do not have a Turnitin “user profile” yet,
please go to www.up.edu/turnitin and click on the link to directions for
students for using Turnitin. (There are links to this page on the English
Department website and on the Writing Center website, as well as our class’s
own webpage .) Here is the information
you will need to login at www.turnitin.com
and then be able to submit papers for each of our assignments: English 460
Contemporary American Poetry Class
ID: see print syllabus Enrollment
Password: see print syllabus .
DISABILITIES STATEMENT:
If you have a disability and require an
accommodation to fully participate in this class, contact the Office for
Students with Disabilities (OSWD), located in the
GRADING: All assignments must be completed in
order to pass the class.
Short papers (10% each)...........60%
Kick-Off Report....................... 5%
Longer paper & presentation….25%
Participation............................. 10%
100%
Paper Evaluation
Standards—English Department,
A: The A paper is excellent. It expresses a significant idea in a superior
manner. Its thesis is clear, consistent
and well-argued, and the evidence, well-analyzed, strongly supports the
thesis. The organization is logical, and
the writing is inventive, precise and grammatically sound. From its compelling introduction to its
provocative conclusion, the paper fully considers and engages the reader in the
expression of its argument.
B: The B paper is good. It expresses a sound idea in a functional
manner. Its thesis is generally
relevant, clear, and well-supported, though evidence and analysis of that
evidence may be lacking in places. The
paper is logically organized, although it may lack coherence in structure. Stylistically and mechanically, the writing
is sound but may contain some minor distractions or errors.
C: The C paper is fair. It expresses a merely adequate idea in an
ordinary manner. Its thesis is vague or
undeveloped, and it frequently contains lapses in reason or support. Often the expression of the idea is weak
because the writer has not completely thought through the argument, and the
paper’s structure, which is typically confused and lacking clear transitions,
reflects this weakness. The writing may
contain major grammatical and stylistic problems.
D: The D paper is poor. It expresses an unclear point in a weak
manner. It may fail to address the
assignment. Its thesis is extremely
vague, unclear, or illogical; it suffers from major problems in organization,
and its evidence, if present, does not clearly connect to the thesis. The writing is error-ridden and demonstrates
little consciousness of audience.
F: The F paper is unintelligible. It contains no point or its point is
plagiarized.
SYLLABUS:
English 460, Contemporary American Poetry—Herman Asarnow
Week 1 September 1-3
T—Introduction
to the class, and to each other. Read
Carol Muske, “What is a Poem?” (on reserve, online, and sent to you ahead of
time). Take notes. Bring anthology every day for first 3 weeks.
TH—Bring
the anthology to class. Ronald Baughman, “A Field Guide to Recent Schools of
American Poetry,” on reserve. Take notes. Bring the anthology to class. Also read: T.S. Eliot, “Tradition & the
Individual Talent,” on reserve.
Week 2 September
8-10
T—
Read packet of short pieces on
Modernism/Post Modernism/New Criticism.
(Suggested, but not required, on reserve, Gelpi, “The Genealogy of
Postmodernism,” first 8 pages, plus Glossary.) Also
read in anthology, these “Academic poets”: Bishop, p. 41, ff., “The Fish,”
“In the Waiting Room,” “One Art”; Wilbur, 553, ff., “Love Calls Us...” “The
Writer,” “The Lilacs” and “Mayflies”; Merrill, 333ff., “Laboratory Poem,”
“Charles on Fire,” and “
TH—Confessional
Poetry, continued: Berryman, 33 ff., “Filling her compact & delicious
body,” “Life, friends, is boring,” “There sat down” and “172.” And Alicia
Ostriker, “Beyond Confession...” also on reserve. Read
Imagism handout. “Black Mountain
poets”: Creeley, 89ff, “I Know a Man,” “ The Flower,” “The Language,”
“Something,” “The Warning,”; Levertov, 299
ff, “The Poem Unwritten,” “Our Bodies,” “The Mutes,” “Wedding Ring” “Life at War.” Also read:
Amy Lowell, “On imagism,” on reserve; also Levertov, “Some Notes on
Organic Form”
Week
3 September 15-17
T—“Deep
Imagists”—Read Bly, 49ff., “An
TH—
“The Beats”: Ginsburg, 145 ff., “from Howl” and “
Week
4 September 22-24
T—Mary
Oliver, White Pine; also read Kathryn VanSpanckeren’s
“Contemporary American Poetry,” on reserve.
TH— Mary Oliver, White Pine
Week
5 September 29-October 1
T—Rita Dove, Thomas and Beulah
TH—
Rita Dove, Thomas and Beulah
T-- Levine, The Simple Truth. Also read: Levine, “The Poet in New York in Detroit” on reserve. Optional: check out the interview with Levine, on reserve. Handout on syllabics.
TH—
Levine, The Simple Truth
Week
7 October 13-15
T— Andrew Hudgins, After the Lost War .
TH—
Andrew Hudgins, After the Lost War
T—Chase
Twichell, The Snow Watcher .
TH—
Chase Twichell, The Snow Watcher
Week
10 November 3-5 Poet
Chase Twichell reads at UP, Thurs., Nov. 5th, 7: 30 p.m., BC 163.
T—A.E. Stallings, Hapax Also read, on reserve: Sadoff, Ira. “Neo-Formalism: A
TH—Poet
Chase Twichell attends class for a Q&A about her work, and about poetry.
Week
11 November 10-12
T—
A.E. Stallings, Hapax
TH—Li-Young
Lee, Behind My Eyes
Week
12 November 17-19
T—
Li-Young Lee, Behind My Eyes
TH— C.K. Williams, The Singing (Be sure to watch the DVD of his reading from this book
at UP!)
Week
13 November 24-26
T— C.K. Williams, The Singing
TH—Thanksgiving!
Feast, play, rest.
Week
14 December 1-3
T— Glück, The Seven Ages
TH—
Glück, The
Seven Ages (One early final project
presentation today.)
Week
15 December 8-10 Longer
Analysis/Research papers Due: Tuesday, December 8th.
M—
Final project presentations.
TH—
Final project presentations.
No
Final Exam.
No Final Exam in this Class—Anyone who wishes to meet with
me during the exam period should let me know ahead of time so that I might be
available for him or her.